University AI Readiness

Assess readiness across the whole institution.

University AI readiness is not one score. It spans leadership, teaching, administration, research, information protection, infrastructure, approved tools, governance and people.

Canadian university campus representing governed AI readiness and research protection.
Readiness dimensions

Find the gaps before scaling

AFA reviews the institution as a connected system.

01

Leadership & strategy

Is there a shared purpose, ownership and sequence for AI adoption?

02

Students & teaching

Are approved uses, academic expectations and AI literacy clear?

03

Research & IP

Are unpublished findings, sponsored research, datasets and commercialization pathways protected?

04

Workplace AI

Are permissions and information ready for Copilot or other enterprise AI?

05

Sovereign architecture

Are sensitive workloads routed to appropriate private, hybrid or approved environments?

06

Governance & capability

Are policies, evaluation, training, escalation and ownership practical enough to operate?

Assessment

From institution-wide questions to prioritized action

The output should identify what can move now and what requires groundwork.

Discover

Interview key functions and review representative workloads.

Map

Document current tools, controls, information and responsibilities.

Prioritize

Identify near-term opportunities and high-risk gaps.

Sequence

Define workshops, policy, training, architecture or pilots in the right order.

Research protectionGoverned adoptionFaculty and staff enablementPractical roadmap
The institutional decision

Enable AI without surrendering research value

The assessment distinguishes what can use approved public services, what needs additional controls and what should remain in institutionally governed environments.

Readiness baseline

Understand governance, data, infrastructure, people and current experimentation.

Priority use cases

Identify opportunities in teaching, research, administration and student services.

Protection decisions

Address confidential research, patent timing, sponsor restrictions and commercialization.

Sequenced roadmap

Define the first responsible pilot, owners, training and decision gates.

Request the next conversation

Share the workload, decision or outcome you need to clarify. A human will review the context.

Do not include personal health information, credentials, unpublished research, invention details or confidential security information in this public form.

Protect discovery while building institutional capability.

Begin with a clear picture of what the university should enable, govern, protect and build first.

Start a University AI Readiness Assessment
Request a Conversation