Leadership & strategy
Is there a shared purpose, ownership and sequence for AI adoption?
University AI Readiness
University AI readiness is not one score. It spans leadership, teaching, administration, research, information protection, infrastructure, approved tools, governance and people.

AFA reviews the institution as a connected system.
Is there a shared purpose, ownership and sequence for AI adoption?
Are approved uses, academic expectations and AI literacy clear?
Are unpublished findings, sponsored research, datasets and commercialization pathways protected?
Are permissions and information ready for Copilot or other enterprise AI?
Are sensitive workloads routed to appropriate private, hybrid or approved environments?
Are policies, evaluation, training, escalation and ownership practical enough to operate?
The output should identify what can move now and what requires groundwork.
Interview key functions and review representative workloads.
Document current tools, controls, information and responsibilities.
Identify near-term opportunities and high-risk gaps.
Define workshops, policy, training, architecture or pilots in the right order.
The assessment distinguishes what can use approved public services, what needs additional controls and what should remain in institutionally governed environments.
Understand governance, data, infrastructure, people and current experimentation.
Identify opportunities in teaching, research, administration and student services.
Address confidential research, patent timing, sponsor restrictions and commercialization.
Define the first responsible pilot, owners, training and decision gates.
Share the workload, decision or outcome you need to clarify. A human will review the context.
Begin with a clear picture of what the university should enable, govern, protect and build first.